Monday, May 26, 2008

Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia, Eight Bogus Restraining Orders, Conspiracy and False Arrest

The Assemblywoman Garcia from Cathedral City, California
is NOT a friend of homeowner associations,
or, the people she has taken an oath to defend.

Falsely Jailed by aide of Bonnie Garcia
on bogus and void restraining order


SUMMARY OF EVENTS:

December 7, 2004: Press Conference with Pat Cooper, aide to Senator Ducheny, Kim Trone, a reporter from the Desert Sun, and a documentary film maker, Madelene Hunter-Patterson. We also had a number of homeowners from other association at the meeting. Candy, from Bonnie Garcia's office called and said she was coming. She never did make the meeting, and did not even call to apologize. So, I went into the Garcia office in Cathedral City to try and make an appointment with Mrs. Garcia, with the stated purpose of speaking to Homeowner Association problems. I was given an appointment with Mary Brhel.

January 29: I went into Ms. Garcia's office in Cathedral City for an appointment with her aide, Mary Brhel (wife of ex-Deputy District Attorney, Martin Brhel) about involvement with the problems with homeowner associations. [Hispanics are the most foreclosed group of people in the State of California.] She refused to let me address the problems of HOAs in general. Rather she wanted to hear, and insisted I tell her my "personal" story! So, I told her all about Shadowcrest HOA, and the problems we were experiencing, including void restraining orders to keep me out of board meetings, my false arrests, stalking and battery by board members, perjury, false and illegal fines, and of course the attempts made on two families for non-judicial foreclosure. Brhel acted rightly, and truly shocked, as do most who hear these stories of out of control HOA boards, unethical attorneys, and greedy management companies. We had a good conversation, and she even gave me a bouquet of flowers and congratulated me for being "an activist".

However, before going to the Garcia Office that morning I had been in the Cathedral City Police Department (CCPD), at their request; they had called me in on a ruse, as I would discover months later, telling me they were "doing an investigation of a complaint" I had made against Sergeant Hatfield, for his participation in a false arrest, abuse of process and abuse while in custody and I told two officers, Sgt. Charles Robbinson, and Captain Kevin Connor I was going to the Garcia Office that morning; CCPD is next door to the Garcia Office.

February 2: Mary Behel called me back, stating "You have made all kinds of problems with the
Cathedral City Police Department, and other government agencies, and you are a threat, and I am placing you on a list in Sacramento as a threat"! She hung up on me without telling me where she had received this information.

February 3-5: CONSPIRACY begins between the Garcia Office staff, the Cathedral City Police Department, my HOA Board of Directors, and stretching all the way to the Riverside County District Attorney's office in Indio began.The proof of this conspiracy is well documented by Cathedral City Attorney, Kendall Berkey in the 65 page Memo of Cost in Case No. 0424575 ROBINSON v. STEPHENS, Riverside Count Superior Court, Indio, CA.

February 9: Madelene Hunter-Patterson called Ms. Brhel at her office and was given to Richard Harmon, Chief of Staff. He told her that "We had a couple of officers in here that said, 'Sharon is crazy, and has been arrested multiple times. She is a threat, and you should not talk to her'".

Because of this, I was interviewed by Edwin Olavie, Investigator with the California Highway Patrol: Mr. Olavie "Did not consider me a threat"!

April 6: Ms. Garcia sent me a rude letter, that basically said, "I can do nothing to help you, stay out of my office!"

April 8: LETTER SENT TO BONNIE GARCIA:

Bonnie Garcia
PO Box 942d849Sacramento, CA 94249-0080
Re: In response to your April 6, 2004 letter

Dear Mrs. Garcia;

1-Last Tuesday I spent an hour talking, [taped] with Investigator, Edwin Olavi, CHP [213-897-4564], regarding Mary Brahby's bogus accusations against me when I stopped by to tell her, "There is going to be an investigation into the officers who went into the office in Cathedral City and slandered me". I have already been publicly in front of the City Council addressing this issue, and I intend to push for further investigation. I also intend to continue to tell all I meet just how you responded to this, without every asking for my side of the story, You are basically an untrustworthy politician, who does not take responsibility to discover all of the facts.
2- I have NEVER asked for "your assistance"! Your Cathedral City officer had an invitation to attend a meeting in my home with Senator, Denise Moreno-Ducheny's aid, Pat Cooper, Kim Trone, Desert Sun reporter, Madelene Patterson, documentary filmmaker, along with several homeowners from various associations regarding HOA problems of non judicial foreclosure. Your officer called and said she would attend and NEVER came. So much for YOUR interest in the problems of "the people" -- Hispanics are the most non-judicially foreclosed on group of people in America.
3- I have no interest in ever contacting your office again. It is quite obvious you have no interest in this cause, even though it is right in your own back yard.
STOP sending me YOUR political propaganda - I will never vote for you! In fact, I and many others in HOAs will be supporting any candidate who challenges you, and telling them, and everyone else what you have done to me.
Let this letter serve as final notice to you to remove my name from your mailing list, and, stop harassing ME!

Cc: Senator Denise DuchenyEdwin Olavi, Investigator, CHP; Sergeant Laura Hanlon, "Professional Standards"CCPD; AHRC. com All other interested parties


Investigator Olavi has found me to not be a threat!

May 14: Ms. Garcia, out of mean-spiritedness filled 8 petitions for a restraining order against me, with no police reports, no proof of statutory criteria, and in violation of my constituionally protected rights.

May 2006: The restraining order of Bonnie Garcia is void on the face, and Commissioner J. McCoy agreed to dismiss it as such if I would have Brhel and Harmon personally served. One of Garcia's office workers, "Candy H." was in court during these proceedings, yet I was still falsely arrested when I went to the Garcia office -- to challenge this bogus, void on the face order, and at a Preliminary Hearing, the Garcia staff member lied, and did not bother to tell the court the truth of this being a void order!

June 2006, Bonnie Garcia's aide then went into a Preliminary Hearing, RE: People v. Sharon Stephens; Case: INF054715 , and lied, stating I had violated [a void on the face] restraining order by going to her office, to make a complaint.

I am filing a petition to have all of these bogus orders dismissed, but I spent over a year in jail, much of it in 24 hour a day solitary confinement, as is documented on this blog, with much abuse.

Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia could dismiss these void orders on her own, but refuses to do so.

TAKE NOTE: Constitutionally protected activity, such as making police reports, or complaints of any type are excluded from the meaning of "course of conduct" with regards to a restraining order. Schraer v. Berkeley Property Owners Ass'n, 207 Cal.App.3d 719 (1989). Schild v. Rubin, 232 Cal.App.3d 755, 763 (1991)

Course of conduct" is defined as a "pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Code of Civil Procedure 527.6(b); see also Leydon v. Alexander, 212 Cal.App.3d 1, 5 (1989)

A trial court may not issue an injunction against harassment unless it finds by clear and convincing evidence that unlawful harassment already exists in fact. Code of Civil Procedure ß 527.6(d); Schraer, supra, 207 Cal.App.3d 719.

Constitutionally protected activity is excluded from the meaning of 'course of conduct', Code of Civil Procedure 527.6(b), there is no need to entertain the traditional inquiry as to whether clear and convincing evidence exists warranting injunctive relief.

There must be medical, psychological, or other evidence establishing that the 'harassing' activity is the cause of "substantial emotional distress" within meaning of C.C.P. 527.6(b)). Schild v. Rubin, 232 Cal.App.3d 755, 763 (1991)

Elder Abuse Law: Penal Code 368: Elder abuse protection applies to any resident in California who is 65 years of age or older; Broadly speaking, abuse includes physical abuse, neglect, fiduciary abuse, abandonment, isolation or other treatment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental suffering...

I want Bonnie Garcia's bogus and void order dismissed, and my name removed from the "Threat List" in Sacramento. I shall continue to pursue this.

Such void on the face judgments lack jurisdiction and can legally be ignored as they neither bind, nor bar anyone. Obviously a judgment, though final and on the merits, has no binding force and is subject to collateral attack if it is wholly void for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter or person, and perhaps for excess of jurisdiction, or where it is obtained by extrinsic fraud. [Citations.]" 7 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, Judgment, Â 286, p. 828.


MRS. BONNIE GARCIA, Assemblywoman from Palm Springs California is NOT a friend of homeowner associations, or the very people she has taken an oath to protect.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia, and Cindy Uken's Yellow Journalism


Homeowner requests fair news reporting by the Desert Sun
June 19, 2004

By Sharon Stephens
Cathedral City, California -


The following is a letter to Ciny Uken, the opinion editor of The Desert Sun in Palm Springs, California from a homeowner, Sharon StephensDear Cindy Uken,Re:


Your "story" PHONE, FAX OPEN DOOR TO WOMAN'S 'HARASSMENT' What a slanderous and slanted piece of commentary this is!!! And, you didn't even ask me for my side of the story.

You are a journalist?

Then there are the FACTS:Bonnie Garcia , my local State Representative, was not in court on Thursday. However, she will be on July 19, at 8:30 AM to answer to this blatant SLAPP suit.

Garcia didn't file for these 8 Restraining Orders, using taxpayer's money of over $2,000 until after I said I would "not vote for her, and would tell everyone what she did to me. Now Garcia is using individuals from my homeowner association as her "witnesses." These are men named in my cases against the homeowners association for battering me and other illegalities. These men are her "witnesses"; even though they are being sued right now, and have cases pending in the District Attorney's office for battery. Great guys to associate with Bonnie!

As for the Cathedral City Police, they filed a Restraing Order against me when I demanded an investigation into the Bonnie Garcia incident, where two officers went to Garcia's office and slandered me to her staff. I have a witness, [Madelene Hunter-Patterson.]

They want me to "shut up" about this incident, and, what better way? ALL of the phone calls I made were to make a legitimate police report, and the dispatcher continued to hang up on me, refusing to take the report, or to connect me to an officer who would take the report.

Wonder if the Desert Sun will allow me to answer this piece of yellow Journalism?
I doubt it; they have continuously refused to do stories on real homeowner association problems.

The readers of the Desert Sun need to ask, WHY they sensationalize "stories" that refuse to present both sides of the issue?

.

Friday, May 23, 2008

COMPLAINT: HONORABLE B.J. BJORK; Riverside County, CA


TO
Commission on Judicial Performance
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco, California 94102

May 23, 2008

From:
SHARON STEPHENS
760.835.8210

RE:
HONORABLE B. J. BJORK
Larson Justice Center
46-200 Oasis Street; Indio, CA

Riverside County:
People v. Stephens; Case # INF054715

On June 8, 2006 I was falsely arrested while going into court to dismiss a void on the face restraining order, by Riverside County District Attorney, Rich Twiss on a 422.6 (A) PC, Misdemeanor hate crime action. I have no idea on what basis that charge was made.

A quick reading of the case, Trylson v. Stephens INC57008 would have proved it was void on the face, and, Commissioner J. McCoy had already agreed to dismiss it; this is all in the court record, and, in fact there was a Charging Affidavit for Perjury against Trylson, and her witness, Kent Robins.

The truth and evidence was there for District Attorney Investigator Twiss to ascertain.

Investigator Twiss detained me from going into court on official proceedings: 18 U.S.C.1515 (a) (1), (i) a proceeding before a judge or court of the United States which is Obstruction of Justice, 18 U.S.C 1503, which is also a Perversion of Justice, PC 182.5, which is also Contempt of Court. And, I received no Miranda rights: California v. Prysock 453 U.S. 355 (1981).

No one can be punished for disobedience of a void order. Mitchell v. Superior Court (1972) 28 Cal. App. 3d 759, 764, citing Fortenbury v. Superior Court (1940) 16 Cal. 2d 405, 408-09; see In re Berry (1968) 68 Cal. 2d 137, 147

Twiss handcuffed me, refused to let me appear in court, and would not hear what I had to say; he literally marched me through the court house, to HONORABLE B. J. BJORK, who imposed on me the excessive, unconstitutional,unreasonable bail of $500,000 -- on a unproven misdemeanor!

The Eighth Amendment itself does not speak of any right to bail, but it does prohibit the imposition of excessive bail.

I asked Judge Bjork for release on my own recognizance (O.R.), and told him the order is void. In a most rude, and insensitive manner, Judge Bjork denied me O.R., and told me, You had better hope the order is void! and then he had me incarcerated in jail, where I was not allowed even a phone call until June 22, and remained for over a year, suffering much well-documented abuse.

An officer may detain a person for a reasonable time to conduct their investigation, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Rich Twiss did no investigation; he in fact ignored me. And, Judge Bjork could have looked at the case, on the computer to see it was void, and, he could have allowed me to continue on into court.

I believe, Judge Bjork and Mr. Twiss was guilty of recklessness, oppression, fraud and malice in this commission of abuse against me.

Elder Abuse Law: Penal Code 368: Elder abuse protection applies to any resident in California who is 65 years of age or older; Broadly speaking, abuse includes physical abuse, neglect, fiduciary abuse, abandonment, isolation or other treatment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental suffering...

On April 4, 2008, at 8:30 AM, I was back in DEPT. 3N before Judge, B. J. Bjork. He was his usual rude self.

It has taken me months to emotionally begin to pursue the necessary complaints in this case, and, there are many -- which I have had served, and are now recorded in the court record of this case.
.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

RIVERSIDE COUNTY DA INVESTIGATOR MISCONDUCT


FORMAL COMPLIANT
Penal Code 148.6

RICH TWISS
Investigator
Riverside Co. District Attorney
82-675 Highway 111,4th Floor
Indio, CA 92201

RE: People v. Sharon Dale Stephens
Case: INF054715
MAY 14, 2008
MAILED MAY 14, 2008

FROM: Sharon Stephens:

District Attorney Investigator, Rich Twiss met with Jill Reed, and Darlene Trylson on May 24, 2006. He certainly had more than enough time to "investigate" whether these women were telling the truth, e.g., was the order of Trylson "valid" as she claimed? A quick reading of the case, INC57008 would have proved it was NOT! It was void on the face, and, Commissioner J. McCoy had already agreed to dismiss it, and this is all in the court record. And, in fact there was a Charging Affidavit for Perjury against Trylson, and her witness, Kent Robins.

The truth and evidence was there for District Attorney Investigator Twiss to ascertain, but he was so anxious to win, that he went on to allow the District Attorney to ignored my right to a fair trial, and never did the required investigation of the cases they were prosecuting me for. SEE: Model Rule of Professional Conduct Rule 1.1, cmt. 5 (1983) (amended 1998 competent handling of a particular matter involves inquiry into analysis of the factual and legal elements of the problem and use of methods and procedures meeting the standards of competent practitioners.

June 8, 2006: Consequently, false arrest! A false arrest consists of unlawful restraint of a person’s liberty without proper legal authority-- there is no authority for false arrest. The doctrine of qualified immunity, under which a public officer will not be held liable for a federal civil rights violation if he or she acted in good faith, has no application to a claim based on Civil Code Sec. 52.1, and triable issues exist as my civil rights were deprived by means of threats, intimidation, or coercion.

Investigator Twiss detained me from going into court on official proceedings:18 U.S.C.1515 (a) (1), (i) a proceeding before a judge or court of the United States which is Obstruction of Justice, 18 U.S.C 1503, which is also a Perversion of Justice PC 182.5, which is also Contempt of Court. And, I received no Miranda rights: California v. Prysock 453 U.S. 355 (1981).

No one can be punished for disobedience of a void order. Mitchell v. Superior Court (1972) 28 Cal. App. 3d 759, 764, citing Fortenbury v. Superior Court (1940) 16 Cal. 2d 405, 408-09; see In re Berry (1968) 68 Cal. 2d 137, 147

Twiss refused to let me go before the judge; instead he had me incarcerated in the county jail, with an unconstitutional, unreasonable $500,000 Bail. I did not argue or resist, though I did try and tell him, with alacrity, the case was void. An officer may detain a person for a reasonable time to conduct their investigation, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Rich Twiss did no investigation; he in fact ignored me.

In Emmett Cartier v. California State Highway Patrol, et al, jury instructions sited, People v. Quiroga (1993) 16 C.A. 4th 961, 966, stating it is not a willful delay, obstruction, or interference with the duties of an officer to fail to follow the orders of an officer "with alacrity."The Random House Dictionary defines "alacrity" as,cheerful readiness, promptness, or willingness...along with the right to silence, a private citizen has the First Amendment right to question and criticize the actions of an officer even at the scene, so long as his actions do not interfere with the officer's duties.

Mr. Twiss was guilty of recklessness, oppression, fraud and malice in his commission of abuse against me.

Elder Abuse Law; Penal Code 368: Broadly speaking, abuse includes physical abuse, neglect, fiduciary abuse, abandonment, isolation or other treatment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental suffering...

Elder abuse protection applies to any resident in California who is 65 years of age or older; "dependent adults" who are defined as any person residing in California between the ages of 16 and 64 who has physical or mental limitations that restrict his or her ability to carry out normal activities or to protect his or her rights, but not limited to, persons who have physical or developmental disabilities.

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE A COMPLAINT AGAINST A POLICE OFFICER FOR ANY IMPROPER POLICE CONDUCT. CALIFORNIA LAW REQUIRES THIS AGENCY TO HAVE A PROCEDURE TO INVESTIGATE CITIZENS' COMPLAINTS. YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF THIS PROCEDURE. THIS AGENCY MAY FIND AFTER INVESTIGATION THAT THERE IS NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO WARRANT ACTION ON YOUR COMPLAINT; EVEN IF THAT IS THE CASE, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE THE COMPLAINT AND HAVE IT INVESTIGATED IF YOU BELIEVE AN OFFICER BEHAVED IMPROPERLY. CITIZEN COMPLAINTS AND ANY REPORTS OR FINDINGS RELATING TO COMPLAINTS MUST BE RETAINED BY THIS AGENCY FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS. IT IS AGAINST THE LAW TO MAKE A COMPLAINT THAT YOU KNOW TO BE FALSE. IF YOU MAKE A COMPLAINT AGAINST AN OFFICER KNOWING THAT IT IS FALSE, YOU CAN BE PROSECUTED ON A MISDEMEANOR CHARGE.

I have read and understood the above statement.
___________________________________

Sharon Stephens

cc: DISTRICT ATTORNEY ROD PACHECO
4075 Main Street; Riverside, CA 92501